With a Developing profile, Jose Fernandez’s outcomes don’t yet consistently match his cycle indicators. He’s still in the cycle of growth where patterns are forming. The ratings have limited value, especially with a minimal amount of games played, expect some unpredictability.
PI=4.009 PIVS=3.910
Jose is in the Developing tier, where his cycle-performance pattern is still forming. Younger players fall into this category while building reliability. The ratings are useful, but variability is higher, especially early on.
PI=4.009 PIVS=3.050
| Level | G | AB | R | H | HR | RBI | BB | K | SB | AB/HR | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | Game Rating +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Excellent | 4 | 17 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.294 | 0.294 | 0.353 | 0.647 | -3.92% |
| Good | 5 | 17 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 8.5 | 0.294 | 0.294 | 0.647 | 0.941 | +7.55% |
| Fair | 14 | 44 | 9 | 13 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 9 | 1 | 44.0 | 0.295 | 0.326 | 0.409 | 0.735 | -3.16% |
| Suboptimal | 4 | 11 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.455 | 0.538 | 0.455 | 0.993 | +5.54% |
| Season | G | AB | R | H | HR | RBI | BB | K | SB | AB/HR | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | Game Rating x̄ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 27 | 89 | 19 | 28 | 3 | 12 | 4 | 20 | 1 | 29.7 | 0.315 | 0.344 | 0.449 | 0.794 | 3.92 |
| Date | Opponent | AB | R | H | HR | RBI | BB | K | SB | TB | TriSync Rating | TriSync Level | Game Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | @CHC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Fair | 2.92 | |
| May 1, 2026 | @CHC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Fair | 3.88 | |
| Apr 30, 2026 | @MIL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Fair | 2.92 | |
| Apr 29, 2026 | @MIL | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | Fair | 3.11 | |
| Apr 28, 2026 | @MIL | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Fair | 3.69 | |
| Apr 26, 2026 | SD | 4 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 | Fair | 6.88 | |
| Apr 25, 2026 | SD | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | Fair | 5.76 | |
| Apr 23, 2026 | CWS | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Fair | 2.55 | |
| Apr 22, 2026 | CWS | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | Suboptimal | 5.66 | |
| Apr 21, 2026 | CWS | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | Suboptimal | 3.50 | |
| Apr 19, 2026 | TOR | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | Fair | 3.11 | |
| Apr 18, 2026 | TOR | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Fair | 3.88 | |
| Apr 17, 2026 | TOR | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | Good | 3.59 | |
| Apr 15, 2026 | @BAL | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | Excellent | 3.50 | |
| Apr 14, 2026 | @BAL | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | Excellent | 4.08 | |
| Apr 13, 2026 | @BAL | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Excellent | 2.92 | |
| Apr 12, 2026 | @PHI | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | Excellent | 4.57 | |
| Apr 11, 2026 | @PHI | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | Good | 3.21 | |
| Apr 10, 2026 | @PHI | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | Fair | 3.50 | |
| Apr 9, 2026 | @NYM | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | Fair | 5.26 | |
| Apr 8, 2026 | @NYM | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | Suboptimal | 4.47 | |
| Apr 7, 2026 | @NYM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Suboptimal | 2.92 | |
| Apr 5, 2026 | ATL | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | Fair | 2.92 | |
| Apr 4, 2026 | ATL | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | Fair | 2.74 | |
| Apr 2, 2026 | ATL | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Good | 2.92 | |
| Apr 1, 2026 | DET | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Good | 2.36 | |
| Mar 31, 2026 | DET | 4 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 9 | Good | 8.99 |
Jose falls into a Fair window today, but that hasn’t translated well historically. His output in these settings is typically disappointing. Jose Fernandez falls into the Developing category, where dependability hasn’t fully locked in. Younger players show this as they refine their discipline and physical tools. The data can point you in the right direction, but it comes with a wider margin of error.
PI=3.667 PIVS=3.810