Sports - "🚧 Beta currently in progress: Everything is free to explore as we refine and expand the platform."
Back to Players
Is Jacob deGrom projected to do well today?
#48 Jacob deGrom
Team: Texas Rangers
Profile: Variable
TriSync Rating:
TriSync Level:
📢 TriSync Expert Analysis
ROTO
Start
⭐⭐⭐
Jacob deGrom may not be the most predictable option, as the Variable profile brings ambiguity for any thrower. Even so, his robust Overall Rating give him a clear edge. The Suboptimal TriSync range is not important.
PI=5.270 PIVS=3.050
ROTO
Start
⭐⭐⭐
If Jacob deGrom takes the mound, he lands in a Fair performance condition that has treated him reasonably well. His usual inclination here supports a solid level of production. With a Variable profile, there is some uncertainty to account for. Still, he’s usable in most fantasy formats.
PI=5.270 PIVS=3.050
ROTO
Start
⭐⭐⭐
Player Performance Cycles (30 Day Interval)
Performance Level Stats (Last 5 Years & Current)
| Level | G | W | L | SV | IP | H | R | ER | HR | BB | K | K/9IP | ERA | WHIP | BAA | Game Rating +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Excellent | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 20.1 | 10 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 32 | 14.2 | 1.77 | 0.64 | 0.139 | +25.73% |
| Good | 28 | 8 | 7 | 0 | 150.2 | 99 | 50 | 46 | 22 | 28 | 200 | 11.9 | 2.75 | 0.84 | 0.182 | -7.69% |
| Fair | 37 | 17 | 6 | 0 | 212.0 | 134 | 54 | 53 | 20 | 35 | 276 | 11.7 | 2.25 | 0.80 | 0.179 | +2.62% |
| Suboptimal | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 18.1 | 12 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 24 | 11.8 | 2.45 | 0.76 | 0.182 | +13.69% |
Season Stats (Last 5 Years & Current)
| Season | G | W | L | SV | IP | H | R | ER | HR | BB | K | K/9IP | ERA | WHIP | BAA | Game Rating x̄ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 31.1 | 23 | 7 | 7 | 4 | 7 | 40 | 11.5 | 2.01 | 0.96 | 0.198 | 5.14 |
| 2025 | 30 | 12 | 8 | 0 | 172.2 | 122 | 57 | 57 | 26 | 37 | 185 | 9.6 | 2.97 | 0.92 | 0.196 | 4.46 |
| 2024 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10.2 | 11 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 11.8 | 1.69 | 1.12 | 0.262 | 4.72 |
| 2023 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 30.1 | 19 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 4 | 45 | 13.4 | 2.67 | 0.76 | 0.171 | 5.34 |
| 2022 | 11 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 64.1 | 40 | 22 | 22 | 9 | 8 | 102 | 14.3 | 3.08 | 0.75 | 0.175 | 5.57 |
| 2021 | 15 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 92.0 | 40 | 14 | 11 | 6 | 11 | 146 | 14.3 | 1.08 | 0.55 | 0.129 | 7.06 |
Individual Game Stats
| Date | Opponent | Decision | IP | H | R | ER | HR | BB | K | TriSync Rating | TriSync Level | Game Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2026 | NYY | L | 6.0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | Good | 5.21 | |
| Apr 23, 2026 | PIT | W | 5.2 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 | Fair | 6.66 | |
| Apr 17, 2026 | @SEA | 4.0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | Good | 4.37 | ||
| Apr 12, 2026 | @LAD | W | 6.0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 9 | Good | 5.96 | |
| Apr 6, 2026 | SEA | 5.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | Fair | 5.31 | ||
| Mar 31, 2026 | @BAL | 4.2 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 7 | Good | 3.33 | ||
| Sep 24, 2025 | MIN | 5.0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | Good | 5.76 | ||
| Sep 17, 2025 | @HOU | L | 5.0 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 6 | Fair | 1.16 | |
| Sep 12, 2025 | @NYM | W | 7.0 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | Fair | 3.21 | |
| Sep 6, 2025 | HOU | L | 5.1 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 8 | Excellent | 3.32 | |
| Aug 31, 2025 | @ATH | W | 5.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | Good | 6.68 | |
| Aug 25, 2025 | LAA | L | 5.0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | Good | 4.12 | |
| Aug 15, 2025 | @TOR | 5.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | Fair | 6.06 | ||
| Aug 9, 2025 | PHI | L | 6.2 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 8 | Fair | 3.72 | |
| Aug 3, 2025 | @SEA | L | 5.0 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 5 | Good | 0.62 | |
| Jul 28, 2025 | @LAA | L | 5.1 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 8 | Fair | 1.64 | |
| Jul 22, 2025 | ATH | W | 6.0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9 | Excellent | 6.73 | |
| Jul 12, 2025 | @HOU | 6.0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 | Fair | 4.76 | ||
| Jul 7, 2025 | @LAA | 5.0 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 5 | Fair | 2.41 | ||
| Jul 1, 2025 | BAL | W | 6.0 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 | Good | 4.61 | |
| Jun 25, 2025 | @BAL | W | 7.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7 | Suboptimal | 7.25 | |
| Jun 20, 2025 | @PIT | W | 6.0 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | Fair | 4.91 | |
| Jun 14, 2025 | CWS | 6.0 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | Fair | 4.32 | ||
| Jun 7, 2025 | @WSH | W | 7.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | Fair | 8.03 | |
| Jun 1, 2025 | STL | W | 6.0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | Fair | 4.47 | |
| May 26, 2025 | TOR | L | 5.1 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | Good | 1.91 | |
| May 21, 2025 | @NYY | 7.0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 9 | Good | 5.41 | ||
| May 15, 2025 | HOU | W | 8.0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | Fair | 7.14 | |
| May 10, 2025 | @DET | W | 5.0 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 10 | Good | 5.61 | |
| May 4, 2025 | SEA | W | 5.0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | Fair | 4.42 | |
| Apr 29, 2025 | ATH | W | 6.0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | Fair | 7.19 | |
| Apr 24, 2025 | @ATH | 5.1 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | Suboptimal | 4.05 | ||
| Apr 18, 2025 | LAD | L | 7.0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | Good | 5.71 | |
| Apr 11, 2025 | @SEA | 4.0 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 4 | Good | 1.67 | ||
| Apr 5, 2025 | TB | 5.2 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 3 | Good | 1.28 | ||
| Mar 30, 2025 | BOS | 5.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6 | Fair | 5.76 | ||
| Sep 27, 2024 | @LAA | 4.0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | Fair | 4.66 | ||
| Sep 20, 2024 | SEA | 3.0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | Fair | 4.32 | ||
| Sep 13, 2024 | @SEA | 3.2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | Fair | 5.19 | ||
| Apr 28, 2023 | NYY | 3.2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | Good | 4.74 | ||
| Apr 23, 2023 | OAK | W | 6.0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 11 | Good | 7.66 | |
| Apr 17, 2023 | @KC | 4.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | Good | 5.86 | ||
| Apr 11, 2023 | KC | 7.0 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 | Fair | 5.11 | ||
| Apr 5, 2023 | BAL | W | 6.0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 11 | Fair | 7.19 | |
| Mar 30, 2023 | PHI | 3.2 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 7 | Good | 1.46 | ||
| Sep 30, 2022 | @ATL | L | 6.0 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 11 | Suboptimal | 4.91 | |
| Sep 24, 2022 | @OAK | L | 4.0 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 5 | Fair | -0.09 | |
| Sep 18, 2022 | PIT | 5.0 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 13 | Good | 5.46 | ||
| Sep 13, 2022 | CHC | L | 6.0 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 10 | Fair | 4.61 | |
| Sep 7, 2022 | @PIT | W | 7.0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 | Fair | 7.56 | |
| Aug 31, 2022 | LAD | W | 7.0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9 | Fair | 6.94 | |
| Aug 25, 2022 | COL | W | 6.0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9 | Fair | 6.73 | |
| Aug 18, 2022 | @ATL | L | 6.2 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 9 | Good | 4.45 | |
| Aug 13, 2022 | PHI | W | 6.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | Fair | 8.46 | |
| Aug 7, 2022 | ATL | W | 5.2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 12 | Fair | 6.97 | |
| Aug 2, 2022 | @WSH | 5.0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | Good | 5.31 | ||
| Jul 7, 2021 | MIL | 7.0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 10 | Fair | 5.86 | ||
| Jul 1, 2021 | @ATL | 7.0 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 14 | Fair | 6.01 | ||
| Jun 26, 2021 | PHI | 6.0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | Good | 3.88 | ||
| Jun 21, 2021 | ATL | W | 5.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6 | Fair | 6.52 | |
| Jun 16, 2021 | CHC | 3.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | Fair | 6.88 | ||
| Jun 11, 2021 | SD | W | 6.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | Good | 8.62 | |
| Jun 5, 2021 | @SD | W | 7.0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 11 | Good | 8.51 | |
| May 31, 2021 | @AZ | W | 6.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | Fair | 7.82 | |
| May 25, 2021 | COL | 5.0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9 | Good | 6.22 | ||
| May 9, 2021 | AZ | W | 5.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 6 | Fair | 5.31 | |
| Apr 28, 2021 | BOS | L | 6.0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 9 | Good | 6.12 | |
| Apr 23, 2021 | WSH | W | 9.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | Excellent | 10.74 | |
| Apr 17, 2021 | @COL | W | 6.0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 14 | Good | 9.26 | |
| Apr 10, 2021 | MIA | L | 8.0 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 14 | Fair | 8.08 | |
| Apr 5, 2021 | @PHI | 6.0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7 | Fair | 6.12 |
The Good window suggests potential, but Jacob deGrom hasn’t shown it in the past. Instead, these situations have often ended in dull efforts. Combine that with the inconsistency tied to a Variable profile, and it’s a risky play. Safer call is to exclude.
PI=4.280 PIVS=3.050